Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:10:56 -0800 |
In-Reply-To: |
<000e01c3dca3$2966f8a0$96a9a2cf@Son2> |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Tracy, I agree with you. I put in my request to
register over a week ago. It said that if you didn't
get a response in 30 minutes there were 3 things you
could do, the first being changing you're e-mail
address and I forget the other 2, so I'd given up.
Then yesterday I get a message saying I sent a request
for them to resend my sign up code, weird. 1, I never
got the fool thing before then, and 2, I hadn't sent
anything to them since. Guess they've got a few bugs,
lol.
--- Tracy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello.
> e q s l cc is not the easyest web page to get around
> in.
> I had trouble getting signed up with it in the first
> place and had to send a
> complaint to the web master asking him to send the
> loggin code over.
> I finally got the code and logged in but I find that
> the inbox and other
> features on there are not easy to use.
> I Think, unless you have a lot of patients with
> difficult web pages, e q s l
> is one to be left alone.
> tracy Son kk4ql.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "shawn klein" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 3:17 PM
> Subject: e Q S L
>
>
> > Anybody know anything about e q s l dot c c, It
> seems
> > like if you don't have a digital camera you're out
> of
> > luck. I saw a message on the list from 2,001 that
> says
> > it's supposed to be screen-reader friendly but I'm
> > beginning to wonder.
> > 73 de kb7clx
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus"
> Sweepstakes
> > http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
|
|
|