OK, that's the one, I know it well, I won't buy another one I used one
of those, it's not accessible, though I'll stick with the T90 and the F6A I
think for a long time they are both great.
John Miller N1UMJ
Owner: J E M Racing need sponsors and crew help
to chat with me AOL instant messenger JEMracing3
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: kb9ram
> The ICQ7A is a half watt, dual band, extended handheld that, unless you
use
> the Icom software, is, in my opinion, impossible for a blind ham to
> program. I have one - a friend programmed the various repeaters and
public
> service freq.s I was interested in and returned the rig to me. So it is a
> x channel, transceiver/receiver that runs low power, is small and
> convenient to use with the tuning knob on the top, but with about zero
> accesibility. I'm not knocking the little rig; I like having and using
it,
> but it is in a different league from both the Kenwood and the Icom T90A.
>
> Thanks to the list for accepting my input.
>
> Pat, K9JAUAt 05:48 PM 6/1/03, you wrote:
> >Makes sense to me, the TH-F6A ia 2 meters, 220, and 440, with a long
lasting
> >battery, tons of bells and whistles, the ICQ7A if I recall is a low power
> >hand held? is that the one that runs on AA batteries? or is it a mono
> >bander? I can't remember but I know there's a huge difference.
> >John Miller N1UMJ
> >Owner: J E M Racing need sponsors and crew help
> >to chat with me AOL instant messenger JEMracing3
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Ryan McManomy" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 5:24 PM
> >Subject: Re: kb9ram
> >
> >
> > > The reason I ask is because the last time I looked at the thf6a it was
> > > priced at 350.
> > > And the icq7a was 110.
> > > This does not sound Wright to me.
> > > Thanks
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "John miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 2:15 PM
> > > Subject: Re: kb9ram
> > >
> > >
> > > > I have the TH-F6A and the ICT90A and both are great radios, I'd say
if
> >you
> > > > go with either of them you wouldn't be making a mistake at all. I
don't
> > > know
> > > > about the ICQ7A at all but the 2 I do have are perfect for me. Very
user
> > > > friendly, maybe some one else can give you some input on the ICQ7A.
> > > > John Miller N1UMJ
> > > > Owner: J E M Racing need sponsors and crew help
> > > > to chat with me AOL instant messenger JEMracing3
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Ryan McManomy" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 5:04 PM
> > > > Subject: kb9ram
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > > > >
> > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C32846.C45E4500
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > > > > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello I want to know if any one has the thf6a or the icq7a?
> > > > > If so how much of a difference is between the two radios?
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C32846.C45E4500
> > > > > Content-Type: text/html;
> > > > > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > > > >
> > > > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> > > > > <HTML><HEAD>
> > > > > <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> > > > > charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> > > > > <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2726.2500" name=3DGENERATOR>
> > > > > <STYLE></STYLE>
> > > > > </HEAD>
> > > > > <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> > > > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hello I want to know if any one
has
> >the
> > > =
> > > > > thf6a or=20
> > > > > the icq7a?<BR>If so how much of a difference is between the two=20
> > > > > radios?<BR>Thanks!</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
> > > > >
> > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01C32846.C45E4500--
> > > > >
> > > >
>
|
