Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:01:06 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Kevin;
One radio is just as accessible is another.
The down side to the 71A is that, although it is a dual-band radio, it is
single band operation.
However, I believe the receiver to be much better then the TH-F6A.
Plus, the wide band coverage is not quite as wide.
However, both of these radios can be programmed by hand or, with the
software.
In both cases, the software is downloadable from the Kenwood web site.
However, you need the P G 4 P.
This is a cord that has a db25 on one end and the plug that goes into the
speakermic jack.
I own both radios and you won't find anything more accessible.
Good luck
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Nathan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: Question on Kenwood HT's
> Hi All,
>
> I first want to thank all of you who sent me email regarding accessible
> lower cost HT's. I have kind of come down to two of them, one lower cost
> and the other one of the high enders. I would like to get feedback from
> owners of both the TH-G71A and the TH-F6a, particularly those who have
used
> both as to the relative accessibility of each. While I lust for a TH-F6A,
> the budget would more closely accommodate a 71 so I would very much
> appreciate some comparisons of their relative accessibility.
>
> Again, thanks to all and I look forward to more excellent comments. Very
> 73.
>
> Kevin :)
> Amateur Radio: K7RX
> Navy Marine Corps MARS: NNN0SHS
>
|
|
|