BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 17 Aug 2003 14:23:22 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Message-Id: <20030817142315.CFHP1778.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[68.212.103.208]>

John wrote:
   >HI Shirley.  I used it a couple of days ago, and it worked fine.  I
   >don't remember what you get back if there is no results so I am
   >wondering if that might be what it is?  Maybe you could  try your
   >own, or someones call that you know will yield results, just to see
   >what happens. 73 and 88 whare appropriate:
WHen I tried it this afternoon I used two calls I knew were good, one
was my xyl's which just got address and name change done on it
recently, the other a local whose call is known to be good.
Email server returns the canned text with no results.

<hmmm>  sEnt a message to [log in to unmask] and will see waht we hear
from that.

73 de nf5b



Richard Webb

Electric Spider Productions


If you put garbage in a computer nothing comes out but garbage.  But
this garbage, having passed through a very expensive machine, is
somehow enobled and none dare criticize it.




ATOM RSS1 RSS2