Hi All,

Saw this question on another list. I thought that RTF would be fine. Seems
like it is just the way the Word Processor of choice renders it... Or, at
least, that is what I'd think. I've dealt with raw RTF, and it was certainly
no big deal back in 96, but, has it changed? Any comments?

Thanks,
Randy

"I give you this one rule of conduct. Do what you will, but speak out
always. Be shunned, be hated, be ridiculed, be scared, be in doubt, but
don't be gagged. The time of trial is always. Now is the appointed
time. "

John J. Chapman
Commencement Address to the Graduating Class of Hobart College, 1900
----- Original Message -----
From: kestrell <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 7:15 AM
Subject: [Nabs] how accessible is rtf?


> It seems half the time someone sends me an rtf file, it appears blank
> according to Jaws. Has anyone else had problems with the rtf format? Are
> there different versions, such as there are for pdf? The rtf files which
my
> school sends me have consisistently been inaccessible, despite the DSS
> office insisting it is a perfectly accessible format. Argh.
>
> kestrell
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> This list is sponsored by The National Alliance of Blind Students.
>
> To subscribe send a blank e-mail to:
mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
> List archives are located at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nabs-l/messages/
>
> You can manage your subscription at http://intenex.net/lists/listinfo/nabs
>
> You can also check out NABS by calling 1-800-555-8355
> Then entering 12NABS (126227) at the promt.
>
> You can reach the list administrator at
mailto:[log in to unmask]
>