Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 07:07:51 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
<00db01c2d721$e9e84080$0201a8c0@Xtra> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Lan,
I would have charged after the third redo, I had a similar thing and
that did put a stop to it.
Jim
At 08:46 PM 2/18/03 +1300, you wrote:
>I have a customer who I'd have to classify as 'difficult'. 18 months ago, I
>built him a 1.4Ghz\256 DDR W98SE system. Since then I've lost track of the
>number of rebuilds and repairs I've had to do to keep it running. He, and
>his family, just keep breaking it.
>
>I'm going to give it one last shot, but it's occurred to me that maybe these
>people need an OS that'll take more of a hammering than W98SE (like maybe
>an abacus)
>
>So, what do you think? Win2K? XP? NT?
>
>Suggestions welcomed.
>
>
>Ian Porter
>Computer Guys Inc.
>Arrowtown
>New Zealand
>[log in to unmask]
>
> PCBUILD's List Owners:
> Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
> Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>
>
>
Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
http://freepctech.com
|
|
|