BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hammarberg, Eric" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"Let us not speak foul in folly!" - ]<en Phollit
Date:
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:40:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Folks,

I am trying to find out why masonry cement (MC) is on the market when
portland cement / lime (PCL) mortars appear, at least to me, to perform
better and more reliably?

As many of us know, MC is typically a mix of portland cement, pulverized
limestone and "proprietary admixtures" which manufacturers seldom (never)
will divulge. PCL is portland cement and lime, period.

Can anybody shed light on this for me?

Thanks,

Eric Hammarberg
Still Director of Preservation
Associate
Still at LZA Technology
641 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10011-2014
Telephone: 917.661.8160 (Direct)
Mobile: 917.439.3537
Fax: 917.661.8161 (Direct)
email:  [log in to unmask]


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
The information in this email and any attachments may contain
confidential information that is intended solely for the
attention and use of the named addressee(s).  This message or
any part thereof must not be disclosed, copied, distributed or
retained by any person without authorization from the addressee.
If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender
immediately, and delete this message.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2