Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | John Leeke, Preservation Consultant |
Date: | Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:41:50 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Scott writes:
>>The biggest difference of all between amateuer and professional is how
well you cover your mistakes ;-)
<<
I might say, "...how well you RE-cover from your mistakes." A part of my
definition of professionalism is NOT covering up mistakes at all. Admitting
I don't know something, or bringing a mistake immediately to light is a
good way to gain credibility with a client. Of course, I organize the work
and relationship to allow for it and I'm always ready with an effective
recovery, etc. The neatest think to do is go to a conference and present a
session describing my mistakes. Some of my fellow professionals look at me
like I'm crazy to do it, but it buys a lot of credibility with others. In
fact, as a consultant, I sometimes get paid to make mistakes. We call it
Testing & Development. By organizing a lot of purposful mistakes, tracking
the results and analyzing them into strategies and methods for avoiding
mistakes it can generate a lot of value for the client.
One of my favorite pundits in another field (Jerry Pornelli, in computers &
electronics) who writes up all his experiences and mistakes in a monthly
column, often says, "I make these mistakes so you don't have to."
John
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|