Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:45:14 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have never gotten this crazy message before and wonder if anyone knows
why I got it now? Do you all get messages like this when you send
redundant e-mails? Ruth
PS: Who sits and reads this stuff to know that 2 messages are exactly the
same? Sounds like a good job. Where should I apply? Ruth
[log in to unmask]
To: Ruth Barton <[log in to unmask]>
Status: O
Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it appears to have
already been distributed to the BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS list. That is, a message
with identical text (but possibly with different mail headers) has been posted
to the list recently, either by you or by someone else. If you have a good
reason to resend this message to the list (for instance because you have been
notified of a hardware failure with loss of data), please alter the text of the
message in some way and resend it to the list. Note that altering the
"Subject:" line or adding blank lines at the top or bottom of the message is
not sufficient; you should instead add a sentence or two at the top explaining
why you are resending the message, so that the other subscribers understand why
they are getting two copies of the same message.
------------------------ Rejected message (31 lines) --------------------------
Received: from mailgate2.sover.net (209.198.87.64) by maelstrom.stjohns.edu
(LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>;
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:01:20 -0500
Received: from [216.114.174.77] (dialup3632.wnskvtao.sover.net
[216.114.174.77])
by mailgate2.sover.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9UE15325356
for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002
09:01:05 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Message-Id: <a04310104b9e52e6b8466@[216.114.174.123]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
References: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:36:28 -0800
To: maybe this could fall apart after the checks clear
<[log in to unmask]>
From: Ruth Barton <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Interim rule #4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 4:59 PM -0500 10/29/02, Ralph Walter wrote:
In a message dated 10/29/2002 1:15:17 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
I'm wondering what horrors AOL.8.0 will bring.
What difference does it make? They're inescapable.
Ralph
--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Westminster, VT
--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Westminster, VT
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|