BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Jan 2003 08:31:52 -0500
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (97 lines)
I have a Keynote Companion, and the problem with some keys is that they
are so small they are not always struck.





On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Junior Lolley wrote:

> When I took the written for my general they waved any graphical questions. I
> have a braille n speak that I can use. I am working on the code hard.
> Junior Lolley kg4itd
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 8:16 AM
> Subject: Re: today's the day
>
>
> > Well, you really have to practice and cipy your code good.  When I could I
> > used the Braille Writer, and when I couldn't do it regularly I used my
> > notetaker computer to do it.  Using the Braille was better and faster I
> > thought.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Junior Lolley wrote:
> >
> > > I am trying for my general now.
> > > I passed the written part now it is the code.
> > > I had no trouble with the written section.
> > > I almost have the code down.
> > >
> > > Junior Lolley kg4itd
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 8:09 AM
> > > Subject: Re: today's the day
> > >
> > >
> > > > Well, I had to do the same, and I was in school and was getting ready
> to
> > > > graduate witha lot of persona  and school projects going all at once,
> and
> > > > was pleasantly surprised when I passed that exam.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Junior Lolley wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I took the tech exam back in July of 2000 and had notrouble. But I
> hit
> > > the
> > > > > studying pretty heavy after work and on the week ends. I didn't have
> to
> > > > > worry about the graphics part thank goodness.
> > > > > Junior Lolley kg4itd
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 7:32 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: today's the day
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm just curious, but did anyone have any trouble with the new
> tech
> > > exam
> > > > > > besides maybe the CW if you opted fo tat?  The new exam was a
> piece of
> > > > > > cake even though I was in college with 16 credits, and stress I
> > > managed to
> > > > > > study about 30-40 minutes just before bed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Junior Lolley wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to wish you good luck on the exam April. You will enjoy
> > > getting
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the air.
> > > > > > > Junior Lolley kg4itd
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2