BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:37:54 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
If anyone wants to connect to me, I have echolink up and in conference mode.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bud Schwab" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: New List Suggestion


> Hi David and all,
>
> I say amen to that.
>
> By the way I missed your message about a list of hams in the  u. s.  Did
> you mean that was a list of blind hams?  If so I would be interested in
> getting that.
> Thanks.
>
> Bud
>
> w6 z y p
>
> At 02:15 PM 3/25/03, you wrote:
> >Kevin John and all
> >
> >Does the techie stuff preclude the ham stuff?
> >
> >If it doesn't then why start yet another list.
> >
> >For every list started, another load of spam and crap comes through to a
> >subscriber.
> >
> >Further, this list is a good focal point for 'blind ham' activity, and
> >if this is fragmented, then the dissemination of activity will be eroded
> >by virtue of dissemination.
> >
> >As a secondary thread, I mentioned some 2/3 weeks ago that a contact of
> >mine can make the U.S.  call list available to blind hams.  Only two
> >took up my request for this.
> >
> >Anyone else interested?
> >
> >73 de G3YXX - without a U.S. call!
>
> Bud Schwab
> W 6 Z Y P
> Malibu, California
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2