I am sending an excellent article on the subject - I hope it doesn't get
clipped for having too many lines -- if it does I can send it privately. Liz
This scientific article by cancer scientist Angelo John appears in the
October 2001 issue (Volume 57, Number 4) pages 429-431 of the prestigious
journal Medical Hypotheses.
Dysfunctional mitochondria, not oxygen insufficiency, cause cancer cells
to produce inordinate amounts of lactic acid. The impact of this on the
treatment of cancer.
It has been known for decades that cancer cells produce excessive amounts of
lactic acid. The fact that most cancers have poor vascular systems has led
cancer scientists to assume that such cells are deprived of a normal supply
of oxygen. Researchers believe that without sufficient oxygen, cancer cells
must revert to fermentation for their energy supply and this is what causes
them to produce excessive lactic acid. I challenge this traditional
assumption and suggest instead that cancer cells have dysfunctional
mitochondria, which prevent their use of the citric acid cycle. Consequently,
pyruvic acid, the normal end product of glycolysis, which normally would
enter the mitochondria for its total combustion into energy, is instead
converted to lactic acid. Evidence exists to support this hypothesis which,
when acknowledged, could dynamically impact both cancer research and the
treatment of all forms of cancer.
It is reported that cancer cells can produce forty times more lactic acid
than normal cells. (l) Many primitive life forms cannot survive in an oxygen
environment and therefore derive their energy from fermentation. In this
process they normally produce inordinate amounts of lactic acid. Cancer
scientists have assumed that since cancer cells usually have poor vascular
systems, they lack oxygen and therefore revert to fermentation for their
major source of energy. Researchers believe it is the lack of oxygen that
causes cancer cells to produce excessive lactic acid.
Evidence for the Hypothesis
Predominance of Cori cycle, instead of Krebs cycle, in cancer cells.
In 1956 Warburg (2) reported that all cancer cells have defective
mitochondria, and they all produce excessive lactic acid. But he believed
then, as the general cancer community continues to believe, that cancer cells
produce this lactic acid because they do not receive sufficient oxygen. I
propose that there is strong scientific evidence to indicate that injury to
their mitochondrias, cause cancer cells to break down glucose into lactic
acid and then glycogen instead of carbon dioxide and water. This forces
cancer cells to depend almost exclusively upon glycolysis as their major
source of energy.
Most cancers evolve from epithelial cells and the remainder from connective
tissues, nerve, and muscle. Unlike muscle cells, normal epithelial cells
produce only minimal amounts of lactic acid. However, cancerous epithelial
cells, are characterized by their production of excessive lactic acid.
Normal epithelial cells derive approximately twenty percent of their daily
energy needs from glycolysis and perhaps as much as seventy percent from the
Krebs, or citric acid cycle of metabolism. (3) In glycolysis, glucose is
broken down into pyruvic acid, which is then carried into the mitochondria
and totally converted into carbon dioxide and water by the Krebs cycle. Fatty
acids and waste products of amino acids are also converted into energy by the
enzymes in this citric acid cycle.
As already mentioned, cancer cells that cannot utilize the Krebs cycle have
difficulty meeting their daily energy needs because they must depend almost
exclusively upon glycolysis for their daily energy.
I propose that cancer cells cannot utilize the Krebs cycle as efficiently as
normal cells, if at all. Consequently they must convert pyruvic acid into
lactic acid and must also increase the production and activities of their
glycolytic enzymes in order to survive. The lactic acid so produced can then
serve as a source of fuel by being carried to the liver, re-converted into
glucose via the pathway of glycogen (Cori cycle), and finally returned to the
cancer cells.
To support this hypothesis, I cite the following studies. Oberley and several
other investigators have reported that cancer cells have little or no
superoxide dismutase (SD) in their mitochondria. (4,5,6,7,8) Without adequate
protection from SD, superoxide, a normal, toxic free-radical byproduct of the
Krebs cycle of metabolism, would injure the genes or proteins in the
mitochondria. This would impair the function of the Krebs cycle and prevent
the entry of pyruvic acid into the mitochondria. Consequently, pyruvic acid
must be converted into lactic acid instead of its normal breakdown into
carbon dioxide and water.
Over the past years, various scientists working in AIDS research have
reported that drugs used in the treatment of patients with HIV injure the DNA
of their mitochondria. (9,10,11,12) This alters the cells oxidoreduction
status and causes a functional impairment of the Krebs cycle. Consequently,
the pyruvic acid resulting from glycolysis cannot be carried into the
mitochondria for total combustion into energy and is instead converted into
lactic acid. This, I propose, is the same reason that cancer cells produce
excessive lactic acid. Not because they are deprived of adequate oxygen. (See
figure 1.)
Burk and Kidd provide further evidence that cancer cells have defective
mitochondria. When they added succinate to various cancer cell lines, there
was little or no increase in respiration, in contrast to the considerable
increases obtained with virtually all normal tissues. (13) Succinate is a
normal intermediate substrate of the Krebs cycle metabolism.
Finally, cancer cells are also known to have an increase in glycolytic
enzymes, compared with normal cells, (l4) indicating the overall increased
demand placed upon glycolysis to meet daily energy needs.
Conclusion
I present a hypothesis and evidence to support my contention that cancer
cells produce excessive lactic acid, not because of oxygen insufficiency, but
because of their dysfunctional mitochondria. Confirmation of this hypothesis
will dramatically affect the development of future treatments for cancer. If
cancer cells must depend almost entirely upon glycolysis for their major
source of energy, any drug or protocol that can destroy or cripple glycolysis
would prove efficacious in treating all cancers because glycolysis and the
Krebs cycle function similarly in all cells. Finding that unique
characteristic of cancer cells, common to all cancers, but distinguishable
from healthy body cells, is the "holy Grail" of cancer research.
It has been well established that caloric restriction in the daily diet
reduces tumor size in laboratory animals. Kritchevsky's studies with rats
show that just a ten percent caloric restriction reduced tumor size and that
a forty percent caloric restriction caused tumors to disappear completely.
(l5) I contend one reason that caloric restriction results in tumor
shrinkage is that it contributes to the increase of ketones in the blood.
This in turn inhibits the activity of phosphofructokinase an enzyme that
plays a key role in the regulation of glycolysis.
We learn in our textbooks that ketones can inhibit the functions of
phosphofructokinase. (l6) On a restricted caloric intake, especially one
reduced by 40%, the body must burn its own fat as a source of fuel. Fats are
converted into ketones by the liver and then deposited into the blood for
distribution to cells throughout the body. Normal cells can burn fats and
ketones in their Krebs cycle and can survive without glycolysis. Cancer
cells, however, would have difficulty surviving without a functional
phosphofructokinase in glycolysis. While a forty percent reduction in
calories may not be practical to reduce tumor size in humans, the same
benefits may be realized with a low carbohydrate, ketogenic diet.
Citric acid an intermediary product of the Krebs cycle metabolism has also
been reported to block the actions of phosphofructokinase. (l7) A low
carbohydrate, high fat diet to increase the blood levels of ketones, along
with supplements or foods rich in citric acid may some day prove a
beneficial adjunct to chemotherapy in the treatment of many cancers. With
confirmation of this hypothesis, testing tumors for lactic acid production
will prove a useful tool in designing dietary and nutritional protocols for
complementing chemotherapy or conventional medicine in the treatment of
cancer.
Figure 1.
Schematic presentation of pyruvate oxidation pathway leading to ATP
production. When oxidative phosphorylation function is interrupted, ATP
production will decline and the NADH/NAD+ ratio will rise, followed by i
impairment of the flux through the Krebs cycle, ii channeling of
acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) towards ketogenesis, iii lactic acidaemia, and iv an
increased lactate/pyruvate ratio.
OMM, outer mitochondrial membrane; IMM, inner mitochondrial membrane LDH,
lactate dehydrogenase; PDHc, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex FADH2, reduced
form of flavin adenine dinucleotide ANT, adenine nucleotide translocator.
(Source: AIDS 1998;12:14, 1738)
Top of Page
Home | Prevention Info | Treatment Info | Newsletter
Site Survey | Privacy & Legal Issues | Contact UsCopyright © 2001 A.P.John
Institute for Cancer Research Created by: American eBusiness Solutions
|