Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:36:56 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 1/13/03 2:56:52 PM, [log in to unmask] writes:
> Canola Oil's main value is that it doesn't contain >very much
> > of
> > substances that should be avoided by modern >day humans, such as Omega-6
> > fatty acids.
> >
>
> Hmm. I guess it's all relative. Macadamia Nut Oil contains 3% Omega-6;
> Olive Oil contains 8% Omega-6; Canola contains 25% Omega-6 and Grapeseed
> Oil
> contains 75% Omega-6. So Canola certainly contains far less Omega-6 than
> grapeseed oil but far more than say olive or macadamia nut oils.
>
I think that the thing that made people think that canola oil is preferable
isn't it's polyunsaturated level -- is it's relatively high percentage of
alpha-linolenic (omega 3) fatty acid (about 10- 15%); other than that it's
mainly monounsaturated (oleic acid). Apparently it's main problem is in it's
refinement. Apparently even cold-pressed, so called unrefined oil, still has
to go through a deoderization process. When it's refined it loses much of
it's omega 3 content. I certainly wouldn't use it to cook with at high
temperatures -- too fragile.
Namaste, Liz
|
|
|