Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:13:54 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That a desirable a neighborhood, eh? I didn't want to go there, just
curious. I assumed it wasn't that snooty Greenlawn/Greenwood, whatever,
place. I never heard of such a thing as what some were telling on one list
I was on--how that at this cemetery they don't let folks take pictures of
the stones. Also, I can't imagine a cemetery with thousands of stones in
it. The largest cemetery I have ever seen probably had less than a
thousand graves. Guess those city folk have to be buried somewhere, but
altogether???? Ruth
At 10:13 PM -0500 12/3/02, Ralph Walter wrote:
In a message dated 12/3/2002 4:39:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
I am pretty sure he was
buried in the pauper cemetery, do you know where that would be?
Ruth,
You don't want to go there. Even dead.
Ralph
--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Westminster, VT
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|