BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"User MartinMartin G. McCormick" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:02:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON writes:
>What modifications have you made to this rabbit then>?  Have you talked to
>any other hams in your area that use 33cm?  What have others done with
>this band an terms of equipment as well?

        I haven't done any modifications to the Rabit.

        There is no activity that I know of in this area from
local hams on that band.  All the signals I have heard are Part15
devices.  I suspect they and the hams won't get along too well
because of the potential for harmful interference to each other.

        It could be that some of the digital garbage I here comes
from local area networks or LANS as well as the cordless phones
and similar stuff.  I think Radio Shack or somebody sells a
wireless LAN that operates using spread spectrum in that band.
Somewhere, I read a caution to people who have bought that
technology that the  encoding scheme used is not very secure and
you might end up with more access points on your LAN than you
dreamed of having.

        The wireless LAN technology we are deploying at Oklahoma
State University where I work is all in the 2.4-GHZ range and is
more Part15 equipment.

        It is all pretty interesting technology, but I don't know
much more than what I have told you about it.

Martin McCormick WB5AGZ  Stillwater, OK
OSU Center for Computing and Information Services Network Operations Group

ATOM RSS1 RSS2