Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:33:11 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
i was talking about a al queda compound that was attacted by american and
british missles and bombs. north west iraq near kurdish teritory i think.
they just gave a few minutes to this as they gave a list of targets hit and
went on to talk of other targets.
yes, i heard about the friendly fire. there have been more casulties from
accidents than to enemy action.
-----Original Message-----
From: K. Salkin
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: 3/22/2003 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: al queda, in iraq?
If you're talking about the missile attack on the American camp, I
though=
t
that they had traced that to 'friendly fire,' and they're questioning
one=
of
our men about it.=0D
=0D
Kat =0D
=0D
-------Original Message-------=0D
=0D
From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List=0D
Date: Saturday, March 22, 2003 23:51:55=0D
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: al queda, in iraq?=0D
=0D
by the way, tonights news is reporting some on attacks on an al queda
cam=
p=0D
in northern iraq. what are they doing there, we all know that al queda
in=
=0D
iraq is a figment of bush's imagination. i mean tom dashell and senator
b=
yrd=0D
told us that. these reporters must have their countries mixed up. we
simp=
ly=0D
must start teaching better georgraphy in the schools.=0D
=2E=20
|
|
|