BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cuyler Page <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
make easy -- get sakcrete <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:08:10 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
The real question was whether the contractor would bounce!

Actually, if you really want to analize it, the contractor and the gyp-roc
gang had a valid verbal contract from the beginning.   If I recall the
precious required class in Engineering Law, the first lecture the Prof. gave
us was about the validity of verbal contracts.   The bikers were famous for
being Very Clear about all of their dealings, so the contractor had to have
known and agreed to rules for the work before it started.

cp in bc

> a check written under such duress is an illegal contract that is legally
> > unenforceable.  >
> > Steve Stokowski
>
> True, but under the circumstances would YOU bounce the check?

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2