BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 May 2002 13:47:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I have heard this one the most but I've heard some really wacked ones
lately.
John Miller N1UMJ
Owner: J E M Racing need sponsors and crew help
to chat with me  AOL instant messenger JEMracing3
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Freeman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: Ham Band Restructuring?


> Hmmm ... I've seen nothing of this.  ARRL has submitted a proposal to get
> rid of Novice bands as the Novice license is no longer being issued and
> increase phone allocations on 80 and, I believe, 15 meters slightly --
> perhaps 40 also.  But I have heard nothing of the proposal you describe.
> Doesn't mean it isn't so, though.
>
> Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
> ... Go Mariners!
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2002, Michael wrote:
>
> > Has anybody heard some rumblings that the FCC is planning to try and
> > restructure the ham bands?  I think the proposal will see phone be
> > restricted to80, 40, 20 and 15, while CW will be restricted to 30, 17,
12
> > and either 10 or 160. One of those bands, 160 or 10, will be reclaimed
for
> > commercial and possible military use.  As well, a power out put of 200w
> > will be the maximum.
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2