None really worth noting, scientifically speaking.  I mean, they're pretty
much all speculation and quackery.

He's a hoot!  Like I said, he reminds me of the old boyfriend who was
paranoid and thought the whole world owed him. The minute he started spewing
vitriolic about his mother, I should've run away fast - but we stuck it out
for another few months, almost to my detriment.  There were other issues too
strange to talk about on this list, so once I broke it off, I was never
tempted to go back.

I almost feel sorry for the wife, but it looks as if she went into the
marriage with her eyes open.

Kat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cleveland, Kyle E." <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c-palsy
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: In Keeping with Aging with CP; FYI


> Yeah.  I think I'll give him my ex's email addy <g>.  After reading his
bio,
> my guess is the guy is a nut (Bobby, what's the clinical name for "nut"?).
> Muscle tension changes our specific gravity, therefore spastic CPers sink?
> That's a good one!  Also, the sweeping generalizations about CPers and
high
> metabolic rates.  He's just repeating an old wive's tale.  I know several
> spastic CPers who would LOVE that one to be true!  So, once you got to his
> research papers, was there anything worth reading?
>
> -Kyle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salkin Kathleen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:57 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: In Keeping with Aging with CP; FYI
>
>
> Gave him my 'junk mail' addy at yahoo.
>
> Kat