I sent the company an email and asked them what was used as a thinner
for their product.  It has been at least a week and they have not
responded.  I suggest to bomb them with questions and see if the
response makes sense or not.  If no response at all I would have grave
doubts about the organization.
On Thursday, October 31, 2002, at 02:36 PM, Becker, Dan wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: M. P. Edison
>> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: Coating analysis interpretation
>>
>>
>> If the coating is really very hard, then the 150% elongation
>> reported could be suspect. I don't recall seeing any hardness
>> data, however.
>
> This from their web site list...I never thought of "Tensile Strength" as
> a measurement of hardness.
>
> Property        Test Method             Test Results    Benefit
> Evaluated
>
> Tensile         ASTM D 2370             451 PSI         Hardness or
> Strength
> Toughness
>
> __________________________________________________
> Dan Becker,  Exec. Dir.    "Oh joy!  Rapture!  Now
> Raleigh Historic            I have a brain!"
> Districts Commission                   - Scarecrow
> [log in to unmask]
> 919/890-3678
>
> --
> To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
> uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
> <http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
>

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>