Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:34:54 +0200 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<3C8B8511.23782.55DFAB36@localhost> |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello David,
Monday, March 11, 2002, 2:08:49 AM, you wrote:
DG> Note, though, that this could be a misleading message. And the
DG> requirement that the cable be plugged in suggests that such a
DG> connector *may* actually be required in order to run a loopback test.
DG> (The card may see some signals when the cable is connected that
DG> convine it that there *might* be a loopback connector installed.)
The test passed when the network was working regardless of cable
connections.
DG> Do these cards have LEDs which display the link status? Which ones
DG> are on and which off?
Status LED is on on both cards when cable is connected and both PCs
are on. With advanced test [supposedly, cards connect and send test
packets to each other and I can see totals of sent/received/dropped/
mis-sequenced/other error conditions], link speed is reported as 100
Mbit/s but one of the cards is not receiving test packets. No errors
reported, though.
With the other cable, one of the cards doesn't receive and I also get
a lot (over 30%) of bad packets on the card that is receiving something.
I'll just get another NIC and try to eliminate the bad card. Those
cards are cheap [$10], I simply wanted to get a better understanding of
the problem I'm having here...
Yours,
+=-.
| Max Timchenko [MaxVT]
| [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
| FAX (413)431-4014 ICQ 2386792
|
| Freelance website and graphics designer
| Visit my site : http://maxwd.hypermart.net
|
| Editor - Graphics artist
| NOSPIN group
+=-.
PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
visit our download web page at:
http://freepctech.com/downloads.shtml
|
|
|