PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Phosphor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:02:09 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
>Rick asks:  We hear that the beneficial fat profile is optimally >obtained
from deeper, cold water species.  If we assume that >the fish most available
to some paleo populations was >freshwater and/or from shallow water (and I
know that is a >proposition rather than a fact), does the profile differ
that
>much from wild mammals?

in fish PUFAs can be up to 20% of total flesh lipids, and 100% within the
liver. most of this will be the beneficial Om-3s. the ratio of MUFA to SFA
seems to be much greater. in salmon it is 2:1, where 1:1 is probably closer
in land mammals. at any rate sea mammals were also prized, so that
complicates it somewhat.

andrew

ATOM RSS1 RSS2