the point I was making though incase you missed it is that a
discussion outside the bounds of physical disabilities specifically
blindness is not appropriate for this list.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rudy Caris" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: January 01, 2001 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: NYTimes.com Article: Days of Plenty Are Over at Free
Internet Services (fwd)


You're absolutely correct David.  Many disabled in some
walks of life, do not need an advocate as they have what
they want.  The disabled from the other side of the
track that I'm talking about, get seriously clobbered
everyday by society with a huge 2x4 on many issues, of
which accessibility is one major area.  These are the
ones who need our attention.

At this juncture of common cordiality, let's just agree
to amicably disagree.

Rudy
.
.
.
> I understand but still disagree with your position.  the disabled
are
> a cross section of all walks of life no more and no less effected by
> these kinds of things than any other class of individuals.  you are
> using a different deffinition of disability.