Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | When I'm in NH I'm a tourist. Ruth |
Date: | Thu, 22 May 2003 19:53:43 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ralph,
You caused me to try to imagine the architect & engineer that would say
something to the effect of "no problem" when asked to design a new
building reusing the columns.
Now my headache has returned. Go taunt someone else with your demented
mind games!
-jc
On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 07:31 PM, Ralph Walter wrote:
> In a message dated 5/22/2003 6:33:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> No word from the professor on whether the fireproofing, floor trusses
> and thin-set travertine will be awarded a Bronze Star.
>
>
>
> The travertine (Nelson Rockefeller's favorite stone, I believe), at
> least where it had been used as stair treads coming up out of the PATH
> station, was very badly worn when I first saw it about 1977 (when the
> WTC was 4 years +/- old). The treads were subsequently replaced with
> granite.
>
> The other thing about steel is that it is NFG in a fire. We saw
> photos in architecture school of some building where a steel beam had
> melted in a fire and was wrapped around a charred wooden girder.
> Several years back I inspected the interior of the Meridian building
> in Philadelphia, opposite City Hall, several months after it had a
> fire that killed several firemen and burned for days. There was one
> level with a sort of bowl in the middle of the floor, where the
> concrete floor slab and steel beams beneath had deflected 6' or 8'.
> On the other hand, the building Owner was trying to claim the building
> as a total loss, and we (on behalf of the insurers) determined that
> although the beams were in many (if not most) cases bent all to hell
> and needed without question to be removed and replaced, the much
> heavier (thicker) columns showed no evidence of having deflected in
> the fire and could have remained in place as framing for a rebuilt
> building. The whole thing was ultimately demolished, but I suspect
> more as a result of a lousy rental market in Phila at the time and the
> building having been technologically out of date.
>
> Ralph
|
|
|