Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:19:12 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>From: "Todd Moody"
> > The assertion that calories don't matter is irresponsible
> > and completely without scientific support. While it is true that
> > cutting calories beyond a certain point may actually slow weight
> > loss, by causing metabolic downshifting, it is also true that
> > eating too many calories will cause fat loss to stall, by giving
> > the body no good reason to deplete its fat stores.
>
> > Todd Moody
> > [log in to unmask]
>
When I said a few of the books I've read (if I remember correctly, Atkins
and Audette) made me think counting calories would not be necessary on their
diets, I don't think they were saying that calories don't matter. I think
they were perhaps just saying that once you are eating the food your body
needs rather than empty processed food, you don't overeat. Not sure. I do
remember Audette saying counting calories would be a thing of the past, for
whatever reason. I'd have to read those sections again before any poor
author gets labeled irresponsible.
|
|
|