BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Donald B. White" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The weather listserv for hotheads....
Date:
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:05:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Message text written by "The weather listserv for hotheads...."
>But I have never seen
anyone address, forensically, this question:  how would a grid-framed
structure - like the Empire State Building - have performed under the same
circumstances?<

I thought I saw a lot of discussion on this soon after the event. Many
opinions to the effect that the ESB would have held up better (and citing
the time an airplane actually did hit it), and some disagreeing, maybe on
the mistaken and easily disproved assumption that new construction methods
must produce stronger buildings than old methods did. Maybe you mean that
these opinions were not fully worked out forensic analyses? 
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2