PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 May 2002 21:53:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On 13 May 2002, at 14:58, Brendon Schafer wrote:

> The only advatage I can think of is if you use many apps that are
> multi-threaded (I think is the correct term). Your OS also needs
> to support multi-threading. AFAIK only the Windows NT/2000/XP of
> the M$ variety support multi-threading.

Multithreading - Internal structuring of a single application
"process" as a set of tasks which are each allocated "time slices" by
the OS scheduling algorithm.  All Win32 versions support this -- if
they didn't, many more Win32 binaries would run only on NT/2000/XP
than actually do.

Multiprocessing - Support by the OS task scheduler for multiple CPUs,
including making sure that CPU caches are kept in sync, that a single
thread is not scheduled to more than one CPU at a time, etc.  This is
the feature that 95/98/ME lack.

David Gillett

                         PCBUILD's List Owners:
                      Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
                       Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2