Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:49:25 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 00:13:02 -0500, Theola Walden Baker <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "William Schnell"
>> Most modern fruit ain't paleo.
>> Blueberries seem OK.
>
>Blueberries have undergone selective breeding and aren't paleo,
>either--unless you gather wild ones.
>http://www.uga.edu/fruit/bluberi.htm
>
>But, then again, what paleo humans existed in native blueberry range?
>
>Theola
I think this is where things are beginning to be taken to extremes. Selective
breeding does not make a food non-paleo, since the only thing is happening is
that you are taking an already paleo food, and only breeding the ones you like.
If the particular ones that you choose are paleo, then all their descendants
would be equally paleo.
Furthermore, blueberries have the greatest amount of naturally occurring
antioxidants of any food, which means in modern times, they are perhaps the
healthiest possible thing to eat.
--
Cheers,
Ken
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|