Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 2 Aug 2003 22:51:25 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi John, I don't know about the others but the headwaters of the
Connecticut river are the Connecticut lakes in northern New Hampshire. I
have never been up there but would like to go sometime when it's not
mosquito or black fly season. But I don't want it to be cold either.
Ain't I picky. Ruth
At 2:26 PM -0500 8/2/03, John Callan wrote:
Please Ralph. Spare me the details. Normally covered anotomical parts and
geometric shapes don't belong in the same sentence, let alone hyphenated
into a single word.
Some exhibit I saw up Nort pointed out that no one seems to make much of a
fuss about the headwaters of the Ohio, or the Missouri...both of which are
arguably more significant than the Mississippi, in terms of volume or
commerce, beyond the points where they seperate from the lower Mississippi.
So I got to wondering...where ARE the headwaters of the Ohio, the Missouri,
the Hudson, the Connecticut and them other big rivers? Can you have your
picture taken sitting in the middle? Are they small enough that if Ralph
were to sit in the middle it would wreck the downstream economy?
--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Dummerston, VT
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|