 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sun, 21 Dec 2003 00:05:05 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Quoting Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:31:12 +0000
> From: Josu Lavin <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: lituano
>
> Car Stan,
>
> Io vide que tu ha usate le parola LITUANO.
>
> Per que causa debemos dicer in interlingua:
>
> LITUANO, LITUANA; LITUAN; LITUANIA
>
> et non:
>
> LITHUANO, LITHUANO; LITHUAN; LITHUANIA
>
> con TH?
>
> Multo interessante le commentario sur LITUANO et PROTOINDOEUROPEO.
>
> Amicalmente
>
> Josu Lavin, Vasconia
> ****************
Ben, mi ration principal es que "lituano, lituan, Lituania" es
le orthographia in le IED. Io non ha recercate le origine.
Io nota francese: lituanien, -ieene; ital. lituāno, Lituania;
esp. lituano, Lituania; ger. Litauisch, Litauer, litauisch;
angl. Lithuanian, Lithuania.
Salutes cordial
Stan Mulaik
|
|
|
