Got your point David and I am talking about physical
disabilities here.  Have been all along.  What should be
understood is my concern for equal access for disabled
people pertaining to all kinds of disabilities.

Rudy
> the point I was making though incase you missed it is that a
> discussion outside the bounds of physical disabilities specifically
> blindness is not appropriate for this list.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rudy Caris" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: January 01, 2001 9:25 PM
> Subject: Re: NYTimes.com Article: Days of Plenty Are Over at Free
> Internet Services (fwd)
>
>
> You're absolutely correct David.  Many disabled in some
> walks of life, do not need an advocate as they have what
> they want.  The disabled from the other side of the
> track that I'm talking about, get seriously clobbered
> everyday by society with a huge 2x4 on many issues, of
> which accessibility is one major area.  These are the
> ones who need our attention.
>
> At this juncture of common cordiality, let's just agree
> to amicably disagree.
>
> Rudy
> .
> .
> .
> > I understand but still disagree with your position.  the disabled
> are
> > a cross section of all walks of life no more and no less effected by
> > these kinds of things than any other class of individuals.  you are
> > using a different deffinition of disability.