Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:05:06 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kale vs. potatoes is no contest, I agree.
P
----- Original Message -----
From: "Esben Brun" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: Sv: Re: [P-F] tubers ?!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Getty <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > I am eating quite a bit of turnips, rutabagas, carrots, sweet potatoes,
> > beets and kohlrabi. But the Paleo diet seemed so
> > vehemently against Irish potatoes. What do you think about them,
Amadeus?
>
>
> I'm also sceptical towards white potatoes. Are they edible raw? (in
any
> significant quatity)
> When I dig up the first new potatoes, I like to eat raw one or two small
> ones (but not more than that)
>
> I tend to think that the main problem with white potatoes, is that they
are
> "bland-filler-stuff ", that
> takes up room for better foods with more , vitamins and minerals. As an
> example - before potatoes came to Europe,
> kale was eaten "instead" of potatoes (as a winter-food). Kale is far
> more nutritious than potatoes.
>
>
> Esben
>
>
|
|
|