Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: the meaning of fish
From:
Amadeus Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 11:15:19 -0500
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Shrimps and oysters do have some EPA/DHA, but by far not as much
as the fatty fish, salmon/herring/mackerel...
Compared to brains - the only read paleo long chain w-3 sources they
are comparable.

You can look at:
http://www.geocities.com/paleolix/PG_weighted.html

This list is sorted by a value of weighted w3/w6 ratio, means
that the long chain FA's EPA/DHA are considered 10 times as efficient.
Or you can simply look at the EPA column (sorry no DHA column)

Amadeus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV