PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: yams and sweet potatoes
From:
Hans Kylberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:49:07 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
You have a name conflict in US english, as some sweet poatoes are
called yams. But there is a big family of *real* yams, which are not
at all related to sweet potatoes other than that they are also tubers.
There is evidence that (real) yam was eaten in west Africa 30000 years ago,
so it can really be considered "paleo" I think.

- Hans

ATOM RSS1 RSS2