Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:27:08 +0300 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
In-Reply-To: |
<006f01c1e781$8750c720$7f7536d2@lindian> |
Organization: |
cez#10 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Ian,
Friday, April 19, 2002, 12:06:42 PM, you wrote:
I> A customer asked me to look at her Acer Travelmate 507DX laptop, which she
I> says is running way too slow.
I> Now, I'm not too familiar with laptops, and I have no idea just how quick
I> this thing should go.
I> It's a Celeron 466 with 32Mb ram and a coupla gigs free HDD space. I'm
I> running it on mains power.
Mobile Celerons differ from Desktop ones in power dissipation only (as
I know).
I> Should this machine run as fast as it's desktop equivalent, all other things
I> being equal?
This depends on OS installed on laptop.
I> Or are laps generally slower than desks? This sure is a plodder. I've
I> checked it for viri and tho it's had Magistr, there's none still active.
I> TIA
Slower/faster are subjective parameters wich requires comparison.
I> PS. To give an idea of the speed of this machine, I loaded FProt via DOS,
I> started a scan, then went to bed and left it going.
I> When I returned to it in the morning, it reported proudly that the scan was
I> finished - after 429 minutes :--))
Try SiSoftSandra 2000 (or 2001) to compare with desktops.
General: I don't know how MacOS is degraded with progs, but in the
case Win9x/or Win2k try to reinstall them (however the driver's
problem for hardware?).
--
Best regards,
Yakymakha
The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
support at our newest website:
http://freepctech.com
|
|
|