BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - Telepathic chickens leave no traces.
Date:
Wed, 29 Apr 1998 10:35:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
>Even Ford's Greenfield Village and Rockefeller's Williamsburg -- although
>flawed -- are more real than Celebration. But have Americans come to expect --
>do they want -- only a pasteurized history at 3/4 scale?  I hope not.

I don't view Celebration as history.  I have not been there, so I don't
know exactly how Disney is marketing it.  I view it as a functional example
of New Urbanism, of urban design that reaches back to sample successful
historic development patterns.  From what I understand, Disney has created
a remarkably livable urban environment.

We abandoned those patterns for spread-out cul-de-sac ranchero villages,
now supplanted architecturally by bad pastiches of architectural elements
jumbled higgledy-piggledy in Mr. Potato Head fashion upon a prominent
garage door, all designed to enclose the maximum amount of square footage
using materials of the lowest common denominator in quality.  Is it the
buildings of Celebration that are 3/4 scale, or is it just that instead of
being spread out at .5 acre lot density, the scale of the place is more
compact, intimate, and decidedly urban as opposed to suburban?


____________________________________________
Dan Becker
Executive Director, Raleigh Historic Districts Commission

[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2