Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 05 Dec 1996 22:49:23 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm forwarding this snip which I got off another list. Iron levels
have a close correlation with heart disease & cancer, & I thought
the RAFefarians might find this usefull. I'm starting to suspect
that not just iron, but other minerals (particularly calcium) get
absorbed in a pathological way when eating cooked and/or meat foods.
>Heme Iron vs Non-Heme Iron
> In another recent large, prospective study, Harvard
> researchers found is that there were differences in the intake of heme
> iron and non-heme iron. The absorption of non-heme iron
> (from plant sources) is significantly reduced when adequate iron
> stores exist in the body. Interestingly, heme iron (from animal sources)
> is not affected by adequate stores and can continue to be
> absorbed. The researchers did find that the intake of heme iron was
> directly related to increased coronary risk. This distinction between
>heme and non-heme iron is quite important. Even if there exists a
> relationship between iron stores and risk of heart disease, it is reporte
>that non-heme iron from the diet or supplements is unlikely to increase
> the risk. This is in part due to the fact that the absorption of
> non-heme iron is regulated by the body's needs. This certainly raises
> the issue as to what is the most appropriate dietary and supplemental
> manipulation as a course of potential treatment for those with a high
> risk of coronary heart disease.
--Doug Schwartz
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|