Alan:
>Then I think you should go into this aspect more deeply for the
>benefit of those who want to know more.

Tom:
Alas, I have only so much time. Good research takes time, and to get a
proper perspective on the subject would require significant effort.
In contrast, it is easy to find one or two articles, show that food
X contains substance Z (and Z is toxic - in large doses and in isolation),
and apply the typical fundamentalist rawist "logic"  and falsely conclude that
food X "must be toxic". I am not accusing you of this, but the logical
fallacy described above is very common in raw, especially among the
crank science promoters. Anyway, that is getting off the point: I
am very busy with other tasks at the moment and don't have time right now
to work on it.

Alan:
>Read what Tom?

Tom:
The article, "What A Raw Fooder Should Know About Nuts" in the articles
section of http://www.living-foods.com  That site has a number of other
articles by me, as well.

Tom Billings