> -----Original Message-----
> From: mitch wilds
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 1:05 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Save a Building/Save a Deer
>
>
> The following legislation enacted this year, seems appropriate to the
> week's topics...
>
> GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
>                           SESSION 2001
>
>                       SESSION LAW 2001-382
>                          SENATE BILL 587
>
> AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF DURHAM TO REQUIRE OWNERS OF
>   LANDMARKS AND BUILDINGS WITHIN HISTORIC DISTRICTS TO MAINTAIN
>   THEIR PROPERTY IN GOOD CONDITION AND TO PROHIBIT THE TAKING
>   OF DEER WITH DOGS IN DURHAM COUNTY.
>
> Which will be more easily accomplished?  Training owners of landmarked
> properties to be good stewards or training dogs to take
> muskrat/burros/etc. instead of deer?
>
> My money is on the dogs.

Actually, I think you missed the point of this legislation. It clearly says
that it is to require owners of historic landmarks and buildings within
historic districts to prohibit the taking of deer with dogs in Durham. I am
wondering if these owners are to be deputized.
___________________________________________________
Dan Becker,  Exec. Dir.        "Dagnabit Muskie, who dropped
Raleigh Historic                     the cotton pickin' curtain on
Districts Commission             my toebone?"
[log in to unmask]                                        - Deputy Dawg
919/890-3678