Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:06:44 +1200 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes, 75, say, is better than 60. In fact, at 60Hz, your monitor would just
about give you a migraine.
With the basic monitors and simple gfx cards I've had in the past, adjusting
the refresh to 72Hz has usually been sufficient to produce a viewable
picture.
Now, modern monitors and state-of-the-art gfx cards can produce refresh
rates far in excess of that. However, I don't know if there's any point in
upping the ref rate past the point where it's comfortably viewed.
Ian Porter
Computer Guys
Arrowtown
New Zealand
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Hurst" > My monitor supports several fifferent refresh rates at
the same resolution.....
> In refresh rates, is more better.. ??
>
> thanks
>
> David Hurst
Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
Digest mode - visit our web site:
http://freepctech.com/pcbuild.shtml
|
|
|