Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 14:03:47 -0400 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Richard Geller wrote:
>It is hard for me to make huge sacrifices for such an important part of
life
>as food. I think paleo is already difficult, but the health benefits
for me
>are so great that there is no serious way I could deviate. But the CR
diet
>is a whole other level of obsession with health and food. I do think it
is
>the only way to sustain greater longevity on a statistically significant
>basis.
I agree with you on the difficulty of CR. The continuous hunger,
weakness from loss of muscle, and loss of sex drive are high prices to
pay for longevity. Years ago, I went on Weight Watchers, and the
caloric "allowance" that they prescribed for me seemed quite low --
something like 1,600 cal/day. Well, I lost a lot of weight, even going
below 200 pounds, but eventually I began to feel pretty bad, and I was
*always* hungry.
I am resigned to the fact that in order to lose weight and keep it off
I must endure *some* hunger, some of the time, but that's quite
different from continuous gnawing hunger.
|
|
|