BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:08:00 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (37 lines)
I would have to agree with that.  If I were in trouble and were seriously
hurt I would want and wouldn't care what band a person used to get
help.  If I were a family member of a person who dyed because of something
like this or someone's wanting to just operate withinn their band I
wouldn't be happy.





On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Andy Baracco wrote:

> Hi Walt,
>
> So you sit back and let someone bleed to death because of some rules made
> by bloated bureaucrats sitting in comfortable chairs in some Washington D.
> C. air conditioned office bu9ilding.  I bet that that bloated bureaucrat
> would quote you those rules with a smile on his face.  In that instance, to
> heck with my license!  I have to live with myself at the end of the day.
>
> Andy
>
> At 09:17 AM 6/10/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >Richard and Mike have it right ... you have assigned frequencies and
> >operating outside of those frequencies is _never_ acceptable and
> >emergencies don't justify it.  Just don't do it and you'll be doing what
> >you should.  The essence of good operating practice is observing the
> >regulations, not violating them in order to render assistance in an
> >emergency.
> >
> >--
> >Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
> >[log in to unmask]
> >
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2