Well, those are neat, but at least with your own digital scanner that
should be out next year you can pick your own talk groups, rather then go
to a homepage and have them picked for you.  Digital will be the way of
the future, and even though the trunktrackers will monitor the control
channels of some digital systems and some trunking software will tell you
what talk group is making noise, it will be interesting to see what this
new digital scanner will do.  I know however that some police departments
will talk about encryption even though the technology for encrypting
Motorola and I would imagine EDACS equipment is very expensive.
        Personally, encryption is a good thing for narcotics agents and
detectives but for every day dispatch for police and fire I don't think
you have to worry about that.  Any how, I'm excited about this because I
live in Michigan where we have lots of digital trunked systems.





On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Mike Freeman wrote:

> The whole flap over monitoring of public safety channels I find quite
> ironic when one considers how many public safety systems -- police, fire
> and medical -- are on the Internet.  I know that various public safety
> systems in northwest Oregon and southwest Washington are on the net via a
> scanner with the apparent blessing of the entities it covers.  The human
> animal is certainly a strange best.
>
> The link I refer to is
>
> http://www.oregonlive.com/policescanner/popup1/index.frame
>
> It's a pop-up window with underlying Real Audio.  Just minimize it so you
> won't hear the ads.  Only problem I've discovered is that, at least with
> JFW, when it repaints, it causes other windows to repaint even if it's
> minimized.
>
> Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
> ... Go M's!!!!!
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON wrote:
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:35:23 -0000
> > From: [log in to unmask]
> > Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [scanner] NEW DIGITAL PROJECT 25 SCANNER
> >
> > Project 25 scanner expected
> > in 'about a year'
> >
> > Uniden America, Fort Worth, TX, expects to manufacture a scanner
> > capable of receiving trunked Project 25 communications within a
> > year or a little longer.
> >
> > "It's something we have been working on," said Jim Cassidy, the
> > company's product planning manager in charge of scanners and
> > other products.
> >
> > Cassidy said that listening to communications carried by a public
> > safety trunked radio system doesn't violate restrictions imposed by
> > federal law, which includes exceptions for public safety
> > communications and for broadcasts intended for public reception.
> >
> > Aside from many other advantages offered by trunking, some public
> > safety agencies liked the relative privacy offered by trunking before
> > trunk tracking scanners were developed. Conventional scanners
> > cannot automatically follow conversations or working groups as
> > they switch from channel to channel. But news-gathering
> > organizations pressured local and state governments to allow them
> > to purchase trunking transceivers - with the transmitters disabled
> > - to continue monitoring police, fire and emergency medical
> > communications.
> >
> > Many public safety agencies relish the thought that Project 25's
> > digital signals once again will give them privacy because current
> > scanners only convert analog signals into intelligible audio.
> > Development of a compatible scanner would overcome the nominal
> > privacy given by Project 25's digital nature.
> >
> > The next step for public safety agencies would be to use Project
> > 25's encrypted mode.
> >
> > "Once a system is encrypted, it is absolutely illegal to monitor it,"
> > Cassidy said. "But when enough systems go encrypted, news
> > agencies will bring it to the FCC's attention and say, 'We can't
> > deliver the six o'clock news anymore because we can't hear what's
> > going on.' What will drive that to occur is when we release a Project
> > 25 digital scanner."
> >
> > Cassidy said that although it is uncertain whether the FCC would
> > act, it seems certain that news agencies will make a case that they
> > have the right to monitor communications systems paid for by
> > taxpayers. He expects news organizations to concede that certain
> > facets of public safety communications should be encrypted, though.
> >
> > "I have a feeling that's where the argument will be played out, but
> > not for a couple of years," he said. "When Uniden produces a
> > Project 25 scanner, many news agencies will need one because
> > many systems are going to Project 25 so quickly. Will public safety
> > agencies choose to spend the money to go encrypted? If they do,
> > all that can be done is to bring it to the FCC's attention that news
> > agencies will be unable to hear common transmissions that allow
> > them to bring citizens the news.
> >
> > "The first step toward that day will be taken when Uniden comes to
> > market with a digital scanner," Cassidy said.
> >
> >
> >
> > Questions or comments send email to: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >   [log in to unmask] - unsubscribe from a list.
> >   [log in to unmask] - switch your subscription to digest mode.
> >   [log in to unmask] - switch your subscription to normal mode.
> >
> > You may also visit the Yahoo! Groups web site to modify your
> > subscriptions:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>