BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:58:22 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (23 lines)
Jody:

Might it not be that newer versions of JAWS are required to do more?

Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Jody Ianuzzi wrote:

> Hi Walt,
>
> I love technology, but I find it frustrating sometimes to move from one
> version to the next.  there is a lot about JAWS 3.2 I preferred.  The newer
> versions assume too much.  Yes, I'm learning, but I feel like I'm starting
> over again.
>
> "The more complicated the machinery, the easier it is to stop up the drain"
> ~Scotty
>
> JODY
> 'PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN'
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2