BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2002 06:36:15 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (35 lines)
Well, I don't know, but not too long ago I heard that some were still on
849 MHz, using digital of course.





On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Blake Hailey wrote:

> I think the air phones are on 2.4 gigs.
> Blake KA5POW
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Harvey Heagy
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:39 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: using 2-meters a board an air craft
>
>
> I believe most radio transmissions aboard an aircraft are not
> allowed.  The way it was explained to me is that one cell phone
> won't effect the pilot's equipment, but if everyone used one the
> combined signals would interfere.  But I wonder why it is that
> most 2 way transmissions are not allowed, but those air to ground
> phones which charge prohibitively expensive rates are allowed.
> Is there really a legitimate concern or is it a money thing?
>
> Harvey
> "There is only one thing worse than waiting upon God, and that is
> wishing you had."
> Dr. Charles Stanley.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2