BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
K5IN <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 17:13:22 -0700
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Kenwood ts 2000
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (15 lines) 
Well, unfortunately, the only way to rally ddecide would be to have both
rigs at hme for a day or so and learn the controls and see if the 2k is
that much easier to run.  Accessability is the main reason I'm lookingat
the 2k and I've always owned Kenwood, but I've always owned Icom uhf gear.
I've forgotten the specs on both rigs.  I think both cover upp to 450, not
sure on that any more.  Do they cover 220, not sure about that.  I need to
find a place on line that lists specs and compare I guess.

If I go with the 2k, I'll probably get the satellite version with the 1.2
band as I also want to get into satellite stuff.
Appreciate everyone's input here.
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2