BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Letter to Ten-Tec
From:
Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 20:36:30 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines) 
I hate to sound like Rush but ...

Ditto!

Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
... Ask not for whom the <^G> tolls.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Lawlor" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: Letter to Ten-Tec


> I would dearly love to hear more about this rig as well.  Sounds like
a
> nice rig according to Tentec's specs.  I would appreciate seeing the
> reply you get from them.  I can't see the CW announcements of
frequency
> etc hard to implement at all but I could be tong.
>
> Thanks for sending the letter to Tentec regarding this.
>
> Doug
>
> --
> Doug Lawlor <[log in to unmask]>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2