BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Louis Kim Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 May 2002 16:04:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
The sky is falling!
--Lou K2LKK

At 05:50 AM 5/11/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Well, if anything should quash the ugly rumors about all those reductions in
>spectrum allocation we were talking about earlier, this should do it.  If
>such a proposal _was_ on the table, it would have been mentioned here as an
>example of the Commission speaking out of both sides of its mouth--giving
>with one hand and taking away with the other.  The fact that no such mention
>is made should be proof positive that those rumors are nothing but urban
>legend.  Like I said, the instant that _anything_ is mentioned somewhere
>about changing allocations (even if the change is, as here, a gain for
>hams), some fool will immediately go off the deep end and make the
>assumption; then, begin to publicize it; that hams are about to be screwed.
>
>--
>  Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
>  [log in to unmask]

Louis (Kim) Kline, A.R.S.  K2LKK
e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Tel.  (585) 697-5753

ATOM RSS1 RSS2