BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Barbara Lombardi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 21:02:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Barbara Lombardi <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
hamarlund made good receivers and the hq129x was a fine one.
Barb [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Freeman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Old Receivers


> I never owned the HQ-129X but played with one in another person's shack.
> Also the HQ-120 which, I believe, was the version of it that came out
> before the war.
>
> Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
> Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
>
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, David R. Basden wrote:
>
> > There was also a very popular Hammurlund receiver called the HQ129X.  I
never got to tune one, but I sure worked a lot of guys using them.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Dave AF6Y
> >
> > At 08:37 AM 4/19/02 -0700, you wrote:
> > >As I recall the hamarlund models, they were...  hq100 general coverage.
> > >Its look a like but ham bands, 160 through 6 meters, I have one of
these,
> > >was the hq110.  I think the hq170 was the general coverage of the next
> > >model up and the 180 the ham version of this one.  I may not remember
> > >these right, but sure about the 100 and 110.
> > >73s
> > >Butch Bussen
> > >wa0vjr
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2