Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:17:43 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
HOW CAN FASTING BE CONTRAINDICATED IF ONE IS NOT HUNGRY?
Loren Lockman replies to Liza May's contention that Water Only Fasting
is
contraindicated in many conditions. Loren writes that Water Only
Fasting
is contraindicated in only people who have "very advanced" Cancer,
Anorexia/Bulemia and "extremely advanced" Aids.
What if these so-called contraindication to Fasting living beings are
not
hungry? Do you force feed them, do you intravenously feed them or what
do
you do if they are not to Fast as you indicate? Is it not the more
wise
choice to deal with each living being individually, rather than
asserting,
that such a class of people should not Fast? If one is hungry, one
should
listen to one's inherent God within and eat those constructively
healthy
foods that the God within tells one to eat. If one is not hungry, is
it
not just as wise to listen to that God within and Fast, not eat, even
if
one has "very advanced" Cancer and/or Anorexia/Bulemia and/or
"extremely
advanced" Aids? You are beautiful and I love you.
Bernarr
|
|
|